Top
New York  London  GMT  Tokyo  Sydney 

BIS seen buying EUR/USD again!!!!!

By   || August 17, 2010 at 14:49 GMT
|| 22 comments || Add comment

They’re persistent. Turned up on EBS platform.

From around 1.2835 we’re back up at 1.2870 in increasingly choppy trade.

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • email
  • Print
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon

Add a comment

22 Responses to “BIS seen buying EUR/USD again!!!!!”

  1. Sakai on August 17th, 2010 14:57 GMT

    Are they still buying at 1,2875 ? I mean that persistent ?

  2. segzy on August 17th, 2010 15:05 GMT

    I also which to ask are bis still buying at 1.2480

  3. kengur9 on August 17th, 2010 15:10 GMT

    of course they are buying it, coz they know USD is a worthless piece of paper…

  4. czechdaytrader on August 17th, 2010 15:20 GMT

    kengur9
    Although I live in Europe…i see USD in much better long term shape , than EUR…i am sure the point will be proven in upcoming months. You sound like You hold LONG EUR position lol

  5. Dinko on August 17th, 2010 15:40 GMT

    Every money is printed paper, gold, diamonds are girls best friend and we are just stupid men hehe

  6. kengur9 on August 17th, 2010 16:08 GMT

    I am long EUR/CHF since friday night and monday morning

  7. SK on August 17th, 2010 17:13 GMT

    hi gerry, should i stay put on buy and wait till tomorrow for better results something like 1.30……..

  8. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 01:32 GMT

    Czechdaytrader: what in the world makes you have that opinion? It certainly isn’t based on historical performance or current fundamentals of course (first of all since you are forward looking, and also secondly because that wouldn’t support you anyway). The U.S. is more in debt, the control over their spending is next to non-existent . They can also easily devalue the dollar by printing more money. Furthermore, it was not that long ago they defaulted the last time by depegging the dollar from gold. The U.S. has furthermore moved more and more to the left while Europe has moved more and more to right… Furthermore, in certain areas of Europe there is huge potential for improvements; surely you must be aware that your own country for example has a huge growth potential?

  9. Steve on August 18th, 2010 02:02 GMT

    @ Johan Europe has moved more and more to the Right?

  10. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 02:38 GMT

    The three important countries in the EU are Germany (the most important country) (centre-right government), France (centre-right government (Sarkozy defeated the socialists)) and lastly the UK (centre-right government (Cameron defeated labour)). Add the strong EU-movement for fiscal discipline (less money printing means less distortion of the monetary system and thus transfer of resources to the government (i.e. in effect this means less socialism)). Even in my own country, Sweden, (historically known for its “soft” socialism and being ruled by social democrats), we have a centre-right government and it looks like they soon will get re-elected. Two thumbs up! ;)

    In the U.S. Keynesianism (looter economics) is currently and unfortunately the norm, is there anyone left who thinks that “Obamanomics” is working…? The U.S. IS going more and more to the left….

  11. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 02:38 GMT

    Steve, what are your reasons for not thinking so?

  12. Lance on August 18th, 2010 02:55 GMT

    Johan: The US has one ace in the hole, providing they are not so stupid to negate it (*not* a given, ), and that is that immigration keeps the US population rising, whereas EZ population is really stagnant. The US has a potential population of a billion or more. And this potential is not just physical, but political. I would say the EZ has no such potential, particularly on the political side of the equation. I do note however that there are right-wing elements in the US that want to negate one of its true advantages. Some people like guns, and some people use them to shoot themselves in the foot. :)

  13. Steve on August 18th, 2010 03:07 GMT

    I’d be more interested where the right is?

  14. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 05:20 GMT

    Good points Lance! However, first of all, according to most population projections the US will never reach a population of one billion, not even close I’d say… On the other hand, the EZ is an area in expansion. Looking 15 years in the future, even Turkey (with it’s young population) might join the EZ. Actually, I looked at some U.N. figures from 2004 and they projected a long term acceleration in European fertility rates while the U.S. figures where predicted to be rather stagnant. So yes, the U.S. has to rely on immigration to keep expanding the economy (especially as there isn’t much investment right now) – however, something fundamental changed in the U.S. after 9/11 and I am not confident that there is political will to increase immigration. In the very short term, the economy doesn’t justify it either.

    Although I hope things will turn out well for the U.S. I think everyone can agree that the U.S. currently has a very long road to travel to financial health.

    If young people can tell us anything about the future; I’ve noted that compared to ten years ago, not many Europeans are that interested in going to the U.S. anymore to study; the BRICs are much more exciting places – that’s where the growth is! Both Europe and the U.S. are stagnating in their own ways but I think that the U.S. has the larger adjustment to make because of various reasons.

    Steve, I am not saying that either Merkel or Cameron are hardcore Randians by any means but if we compare them to Obama, he’s the socialist in my book at least…

  15. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 05:37 GMT

    And straight to the point, who have really been expanding their economy the last 10 years while the U.S. has been busy printing money?
    http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28europe+gdp%29%2F%28us+gdp%29

    Put simply: Keynesianism doesn’t work. One doesn’t create wealth by printing money either directly or indirectly, I hope the U.S. will realize this soon.

  16. fxgai on August 18th, 2010 05:44 GMT

    I too can’t understand why Keynesian ideas became popular again over the last few years. Who runs their household like that and succeeds!?

    And the ultimate case in point: Japan. lol!

  17. Johan Hallgren on August 18th, 2010 05:50 GMT

    Yes indeed, fxgai!

  18. zekelogan on August 18th, 2010 05:51 GMT

    Unless some genius, new economist steps on the scene VERY soon I’m afraid we’re ALL up the proverbial creek, David ;)

  19. garth on August 18th, 2010 05:52 GMT

    all that money printing good for those families who aleady stockpile gold, property, oil stocks,weapons, drugs etc, real assets… they go up in value while everyone else goes broke and loses their houses. then they can buy em all up cheap… economic warfare, eyes and pyramids.

  20. fxgai on August 18th, 2010 05:59 GMT

    Oh, wikipedia has an article about “2008-2009 Keynesian resurgence”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932009_Keynesian_resurgence
    Just a random thought, but perhaps a problem with Keynesian ideas is that they can’t work if people don’t believe they will. “Spend and hope” seems to sum it up nicely.

  21. Steve on August 18th, 2010 06:12 GMT

    Johan, i feel so sorry for many European people who in my opinion are being led down the path to nowhere.
    IMHO there are too many differing cultures and work ethics for this experiment to ever work! too late, under education all part of the goal!
    The bigger picture is something horrific leopards don’t change their spots!!
    but that’s only my view!
    that’s why i left the region!

  22. zekelogan on August 18th, 2010 06:42 GMT
Bottom