WASHINGTON (MNI) – The following is an excerpt from details
provided by the White House Sunday night with details of the agreement
reached between President Obama and the bipartisan leadership in
Congress to increase the statutory debt ceiling and enact a substantial
package ofspending cuts:

Mechanics of the Debt Deal

– Immediately enacted 10-year discretionary spending caps
generating nearly $1 trillion in deficit reduction; balanced between
defense and non-defense spending.

– President authorized to increase the debt limit by at least $2.1
trillion, eliminating the need for further increases until 2013.

– Bipartisan committee process tasked with identifying an
additional $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction, including from
entitlement and tax reform. Committee is required to report legislation
by November 23, 2011, which receives fast-track protections. Congress is
required to vote on Committee recommendations by December 23, 2011.

– Enforcement mechanism established to force all parties
Republican and Democrat to agree to balanced deficit reduction. If
Committee fails, enforcement mechanism will trigger spending reductions
beginning in 2013 split 50/50 between domestic and defense spending.
Enforcement protects Social Security, Medicare beneficiaries, and
low-income programs from any cuts.

1. REMOVING UNCERTAINTY TO SUPPORT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY

– Deal Removes Cloud of Uncertainty Until 2013, Eliminating Key
Headwind on the Economy: Independent analysts, economists, and ratings
agencies have all made clear that a short-term debt limit increase would
create unacceptable economic uncertainty by risking default again within
only a matter of months and as S&P stated, increase the chance of a
downgrade. By ensuring a debt limit increase of at least $2.1 trillion,
this deal removes the specter of default, providing important certainty
to our economy at a fragile moment.

– Mechanism to Ensure Further Deficit Reduction is Designed to
Phase-In Beginning in 2013 to Avoid Harming the Recovery: The deal
includes a mechanism to ensure additional deficit reduction, consistent
with the economic recovery. The enforcement mechanism would not be made
effective until 2013, avoiding any immediate contraction that could harm
the recovery. And savings from the down payment will be enacted over 10
years, consistent with supporting the economic recovery.

2. A DOWNPAYMENT ON DEFICIT REDUCTION BY LOCKING IN HISTORIC
SPENDING DISCIPLINE BALANCED BETWEEN DOMESTIC AND PENTAGON SPENDING

– More than $900 Billion in Savings over 10 Years By Capping
Discretionary Spending: The deal includes caps on discretionary spending
that will produce more than $900 billion in savings over the next 10
years compared to the CBO March baseline, even as it protects core
investments from deep and economically damaging cuts.

– Includes Savings of $350 Billion from the Base Defense Budget
the First Defense Cut Since the 1990s: The deal puts us on track to cut
$350 billion from the defense budget over 10 years. These reductions
will be implemented based on the outcome of a review of our missions,
roles, and capabilities that will reflect the President’s commitment to
protecting our national security.

– Reduces Domestic Discretionary Spending to the Lowest Level Since
Eisenhower: These discretionary caps will put us on track to reduce
non-defense discretionary spending to its lowest level since Dwight
Eisenhower was President.

– Includes Funding to Protect the President’s Historic Investment
in Pell Grants: Since taking office, the President has increased the
maximum Pell award by $819 to a maximum award $5,550, helping over 9
million students pay for college tuition bills. The deal provides
specific protection in the discretionary budget to ensure that the there
will be sufficient funding for the President’s historic investment in
Pell Grants without undermining other critical investments.

3. ESTABLISHING A BIPARTISAN PROCESS TO ACHIEVE $1.5 TRILLION
IN ADDITIONAL BALANCED DEFICIT REDUCTION BY THE END OF 2011

– The Deal Locks in a Process to Enact $1.5 Trillion in Additional
Deficit Reduction Through a Bipartisan, Bicameral Congressional
Committee: The deal creates a bipartisan, bicameral Congressional
Committee that is charged with enacting $1.5 trillion in additional
deficit reduction by the end of the year. This Committee will work
without the looming specter of default, ensuring time to carefully
consider essential reforms without the disruption and brinksmanship of
the past few months.

– This Committee is Empowered Beyond Previous Bipartisan Attempts
at Deficit Reduction: Any recommendation of the Committee would be given
fast-track privilege in the House and Senate, assuring it of an up or
down vote and preventing some from using procedural gimmicks to block
action.

– To Meet This Target, the Committee Will Consider Responsible
Entitlement and Tax Reform. This means putting all the priorities of
both parties on the table including both entitlement reform and
revenue-raising tax reform.

4. A STRONG ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM TO MAKE ALL SIDES COME
TOGETHER

– The Deal Includes An Automatic Sequester to Ensure That At Least
$1.2 Trillion in Deficit Reduction Is Achieved By 2013 Beyond the
Discretionary Caps: The deal includes an automatic sequester on certain
spending programs to ensure thatbetween the Committee and the
triggerwe at least put in place an additional $1.2 trillion in deficit
reduction by 2013.

– Consistent With Past Practice, Sequester Would Be Divided Equally
Between Defense and Non-Defense Programs and Exempt Social Security,
Medicaid, and Low-Income Programs: Consistent with the bipartisan
precedents established in the 1980s and 1990s, the sequester would be
divided equally between defense and non-defense program, and it would
exempt Social Security, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, programs for
low-income families, and civilian and military retirement. Likewise, any
cuts to Medicare would be capped and limited to the provider side.

– Sequester Would Provide a Strong Incentive for Both Sides to Come
to the Table: If the fiscal committee took no action, the deal would
automatically add nearly $500 billion in defense cuts on top of cuts
already made, and, at the same time, it would cut critical programs like
infrastructure or education. That outcome would be unacceptable to many
Republicans and Democrats alike creating pressure for a bipartisan
agreement without requiring the threat of a default with unthinkable
consequences for our economy.

5. A BALANCED DEAL CONSISTENT WITH THE PRESIDENT’S COMMITMENT
TO SHARED SACRIFICE

– The Deal Sets the Stage for Balanced Deficit Reduction,
Consistent with the President’s Values: The deal is designed to achieve
balanced deficit reduction, consistent with the values the President
articulated in his April Fiscal Framework. The discretionary savings are
spread between both domestic and defense spending. And the President
will demand that the Committee pursue a balanced deficit reduction
package, where any entitlement reforms are coupled with revenue-raising
tax reform that asks for the most fortunate Americans to sacrifice.

– The Enforcement Mechanism Complements the Forcing Event Already
In Law the Expiration of the Bush Tax Cuts To Create Pressure for a
Balanced Deal: The Bush tax cuts expire as of 1/1/2013, the same date
that the spending sequester would go into effect. These two events
together will force balanced deficit reduction. Absent a balanced deal,
it would enable the President to use his veto pen to ensure nearly $1
trillion in additional deficit reduction by not extending the
high-income tax cuts.

– In Securing this Bipartisan Deal, the President Rejected
Proposals that Would Have Placed the Sole Burden of Deficit Reduction on
Low-Income or Middle-Class Families: The President stood firmly against
proposals that would have placed the sole burden of deficit reduction on
lower-income and middle-class families. This includes not only proposals
in the House Republican Budget that would have undermined the core
commitments of Medicare to our seniors and forced tens of millions of
low-income Americans to go without health insurance, but also
enforcement mechanisms that would have forced automatic cuts to
low-income programs. The enforcement mechanism in the deal exempts
Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare benefits, unemployment insurance,
programs for low-income families, and civilian and military retirement.

** Market News International Washington Bureau: 202-371-2121 **

[TOPICS: M$U$$$,MFU$$$,MGU$$$,M$$CR$]